Neil Cornish

9.0

Perfect summer wine. Salmon pink, totally dry. Elegant mineral infused strawberry. Takes about ten minutes to finish a bottle. Solo. — 11 years ago

Michael Mcdermott

9.5

Leather chicory nose, drinking ten minutes after decanting a 2005. Tannins soft. Wood and blueberry fruit. Nice! — 11 years ago

Phillip Robinson

8.9

More complexity than the 10 x — 12 years ago

Adam Runka

9.1

On its way out. But still so good. — 13 years ago

Mark Oldman

9.4

#DRC #Richebourg 1966: out of the gate its nose was as compelling as the accompanying La Romanée-Conti 1996, the former displaying an explosive and complex swirl of mature cherry, brown sugar, and leather. But ten minutes later that leathery aspect began dominating the others and the wine started a deep, unexpected decline, its sexy sweetness fading like a volume knob twisting to off. We marveled at this unusual shift, continuing on to our final glasses. Another surprise came at the end the Riche partially returned to the sweetness and succulence of its first moments. Can a palate experience whiplash? — 11 years ago

Alan Weinberg

9.4

tart acids in front with no fruit--after ten minutes, the acidity melded into the background and gorgeous fruit and tertiary elements filled nose and palate, becoming a gorgeous bottle of red Burgundy--more finesse than expected from a Gevrey. Stunning wine. — 11 years ago

Bruce Rudman

9.5

I liked it but thought it needed lots more time and/or a longer decant than a few minutes. Nicely balanced and lots of fruit. It was a lot like an'07 Sea Smoke Ten recently tasted blind and only popped and poured. I will bet it is a lot better after an hour or two of air. Kinda mono-note. — 13 years ago

Dave Kluz

9.2

Crazy. Eucalyptus leaves and blood orange. Light and delicate, yet amazing length and linearity. Red cherry and berry fruit. — 11 years ago

with Andrew, Clement and 2 others

Mark Povey

9.4

Oh so yum!!! Very complex point Gris — 11 years ago

with Pip

M K

9.5

Sweet red! — 12 years ago