Brent Clayton

9.5

From magnum. A monster wine! — a month ago

Samuel Tyndall

9.4

Very dry, high high acid. Leather, smoke, cedar, minerals. Not much fruit. Higher tannins. And a good borolo flavor — 2 months ago

Bowman Givhan

9.2

Nice and light. Wine at home with Matt Brooks. — 2 months ago

Debra Bass

9.2

2019–really needs to open up but wonderful when it does — 3 months ago

with Rand

Lee Pitofsky

9.5

Still so young! But oh so good. — 5 months ago

Gambrelle Snyder

10

Bright acid, tannin, sour cherry. — 5 months ago

John Malcolm

9.5

Earthy (of course). Cherries, raspberries, strawberry, leather, and tobacco. Outstanding, and just coming into its own. — 6 months ago

Alberto Cdm

9.6

Veramente buono👌👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 — 9 months ago

Manuel Buergi

9.2

Dark fruits, blackberries, smoke, liquorice, smoke/ash, spices. Quite massive and brawny. Maybe a touch monolithic compared with other vintages in this tasting. — 6 years ago

Ove Gustafsson

8.9

Still too young but a thrilling ride. — 8 years ago

Bridget Meagher

9.0

Josh blend if 3 different Vinyard sites 20 months in French oak DOCG MICE TANNINS Just Barolo on label is a blend, if it has a name it’s single vineyard 14% — a month ago

Sid Dhar

9.0

Young vintage, but give it 20 mins in the decanter and it sings! — 2 months ago

Matthew Cohen

9.3

Nose: cherry flower
Palate: clean. Perfect cherry. Balanced. Fresh. Awesome internal aromatics. Long. Lingering. — 3 months ago

Ron Siegel

9.3

Cherry, strawberry fruit, savory spice with floral & tobacco notes — 3 months ago

Ed Lehrman

9.3

Smooth as silk and maybe a bit past mid-life but absolutely perfect with wild boar pasta. — 4 months ago

GaryWEdwards

9.5

Yes, please.. very nice Sandrone that just enters a nice window to enjoy for a couple of decades. — 5 months ago

with Logan

M. Christopher Roebuck

9.2

Ruby running to garnet, color. Earthy nose, brush, pine. We are way early of course. Sharp, bitter cut on the flowers, wood present, tannins still quite chalky and harsh. But this will be amazing with time. Alcohol and acidity will usher this wine into another dimension. I would give this another 2-3 years. You can drink it now at a score of 92+, but, hold out for 95. @Antonio Galloni will this make the cut for the future Barolo event?

92+ points — 8 months ago

Tricia Loe

9.6

Wine has aged beautifully. Tannins have softened and the bold flavor paired perfectly with lamb chops roasted with garlic and herbs. — 4 years ago

Rick Baumgarten

9.7

Oh my! Expected some oxidation, but this was showing no signs even after an hour. Dark and rich with incredible depth and complexity. Powerful and glorious nose. Dark fruit continued thru a very long finish. A great bottle. — 7 years ago

with Don

Ned Clark

9.1

Pleasing to drink and very balanced but not what I expected. The tannins are weaker than the fruit and it doesn't wow on the nose. Nothing wrong with it but as the saying goes "I've had better" — 9 years ago

Peter Hladun

9.3

Really fantastic Barolo! Paired it with a vodka sauce pasta dish and it showed well with and without the food. Would definitely revisit. — 2 months ago

Raul Puga

9.3

Delicious — 2 months ago

Jay Kline

9.2

The fruit for the Oderro Poderi e Cantine “classico” comes from a combination of the Bricco Chiesa in La Morra and the Bricco Fiasco in Castiglione Falletto MGAs. The former being considered Oddero’s “home vineyard”.

Poured into a decanter about 30min before service. In the glass, the wine displays a beautiful ruby color with a transparent core; medium+ viscosity with no staining of the tears. On the nose, the wine is developing with very pretty notes of Montmorency cherry, cranberry, pomegranate, a bed of roses, orange peel, fresh sage, eucalyptus and crushed rock. On the palate, the wine is bone dry with high tannin and medium+ acid. Confirming the notes from the nose. The finish is long, drying and grippy. This is all about balance and freshness. These are quite giving already but undoubtedly have a long life ahead. Drink now with patience or through 2044. — 3 months ago

Steve Rura

9.3

Other ratings called this “closed” which I completely agree with. The dense flavors took forever to open up. I popped it at noon for a 7:30p dinner of chick pea and potato pasta, and it was still developing. Highly tannic, but so layered if you have the patience. Darker fruits, yet still some tart red cherry, lavender, rose petals, and ashy dryness. Complex, classic Barolo (from my limited experience). I’ll save my second bottle to see how it develops. — 3 months ago

Ed Tostanoski

9.2

Much softer than the 05 … still fairly primary but much nicer to drink today — 5 months ago

Tyler

9.2

Christmas dinner. Light bodied, vanilla, cherry. Short finish. Fantastic — 6 months ago

Jeremy Shanker

Sommelier at RN74

9.2

An over performer for the money. Was way more austere when I tasted a few years ago, and finally ready to drink. Tar, raspberry, wilted rose, dried mint, Saba. Delicious. — 8 months ago

Pierre Costa

9.3

Classic Barolo — 6 years ago

Mike Levin

9.3

Still holding more of the red color than the other 64s, but very nice tar and roses, and after 4hr decant well integrated with lots of life. — 8 years ago

Nose Reiko

9.4

程よいタンニン、果実味、 — 10 years ago