Cedar, fruit in the background, coconut?. Mature and delicious — 7 months ago
Truly a 10/10. Floral bouquet of flavor and went fantastic with steak. Purchased in Naples. — 9 months ago
Decanted for 2 hours. Still big, no signs of fading. Did not drink enough before it was consumed to review properly, but seemed a touch sweet. — 3 years ago
Good for red sauce Italian and pizza. Cherry. Medium bodied. — 8 years ago
Smooth ripe fruit — 9 years ago
Guests loved it!
Me too — 10 years ago
Paired well with a lamb, eggplant purée, fava beans, piquolo pepper. Would also pair with a medium rare magret duck or other game. — 11 years ago
Almost as good as the chianti in Paris — 13 years ago
One of the best wines for the price. — 14 years ago
Presented double-blind at Tasting Group. The wine pours a deep garnet color with a near opaque core; medium+ viscosity with moderate staining of the tears and no obvious signs of sediment. On the nose, the wine is developing with powerful notes of ripe and some dried fruits: bramble berries, slightly stewed black cherry, dried herbs, stony earth, baking spices. On the palate, the wine is dry with medium+ tannin and medium acid. Confirming the notes from the nose. The finish is long. The alcohol is high.
Initial conclusions: this could be a Grenache-based blend, Corvina-based blend or Sangiovese-based blend from France or Italy. I felt the combination of slightly stewed cherry and spices ruled out what I would want from a Sangiovese blend. Which, left me to decide between Southern Rhône or Valpolicella. I liked this wine…the oak treatment was interesting. I was getting a French barrique. Hmmm…
So, for my final conclusion: I’m calling this a Grenache-based blend, from France, from Southern Rhône, from Chateauneuf-du-Pape, 2017, from a more modern leaning producer using a good portion of barrique. I’ll be damned! I don’t hate my call but I gotta get better at distinguishing these wines from Southern Rhône. I probably just need to drink more of both, lol. Tasty stuff! Drink now through 2039. — 7 months ago
Fruity, bubbly/fuzzy, sweet. Always have it in hand — 4 years ago
Not very bubbly for an Asti & jus a tad on the sweeter side but would def buy it again — 9 years ago
Quirky but nice — 11 years ago
Bold, lush, notes of blueberry, leather and spice. — 13 years ago
Excellent cab! Always great from Ridge, this one is full bodied, nicely aged (still has room to age more, but wonderful right now!, wish i had a couple more) — 7 months ago
Full bodied minerals, saline, citrus — 7 months ago
Ruby colored. Fruity but spicy. Some undertones of wood. Just an excellent wine to with Alla Vita. — 9 months ago
Listening to fado in Lisbon — 7 years ago
So smooth and elegant. — 8 years ago
Tried the '90 recently, spoke of how amazing a producer of Californian Cabernet it is, but just needed a little more time, this '85 is well & truly on point, everything is in balance, there's fruit intensity yes, but the development/complexity/layers are really shining through, outstanding stuff. — 9 years ago
2001, Madonna delle Grazie Il Marroneto Sangiovese. A Brunello with 14 years of aging, doesn't get much better. Still has primary black fruit but layers of secondary flavors. It continues to open up and get more complex through the evening. — 11 years ago
#ilgrigio #granselezione #chianticlassico #tuscany #italianwineprofessional — 11 years ago
Drank at Farinas winery & cafe in grapevine TX — 13 years ago
joy horn
Bought at Pine Orchard 11/25 $70 after tasting at Ridge in 10/25. Less expensive here. The 2023 is rated at 100 pts. Absolutely delicious. Floral aromas, lightly crisp, subtle oak, smooth finish. — 7 months ago