Peter C

9.0

Oddly this tastes ripe. Different from other bottles. — 5 years ago

Johan Bogaert

8.9

Still a very robust wine. Not in the least past its prime. There’s a lot of fruit left, but there’s also a lot of oak., even after 26 years. This has dried out the wine a little bit. Don’t make too much out of my criticism. The wine is very enjoyable, so the bottle was finished without any complaints from my friends at the table.
89/100. — 6 years ago

Brian S

9.1

Started out very farmy and rustic. After an hour had beautiful cherry, raspberry, medium tannins, could taste and smell the whole cluster as there was slight tomato and green herbaceous notes. — 6 years ago

Mr. GrapeJUICE

9.1

Absolute GEM!!!!!! — 7 years ago

Jordi Pazo

9.4

Vila. Avanzadas 2017. 166,90
25.06.18 — 7 years ago

Pinotman /// Andreas

8.9

Again left my notes behind. A good wine but quite big for a Musigny and expensive. — 7 years ago

Jordi Pazo

8.9

Vila. 16,76.
31.12.16
— 9 years ago

Eric

9.2

Not seeing RP’s 95, but it’s good. Great spiced fruit nose. Ripe with a tart finish. Just a whiff of stinky. — 5 years ago

Ichiro Kawachi

9.3

Earthy, violet, plums — 6 years ago

Ericsson

8.9

Good wine. — 7 years ago

Hampus Bejnö

9.2

Svartpeppar, indisk långpeppar och granskog i näsan. Lång, relativt återhållen och kryddig smak men höga tanniner som gör sig bäst till mat med fett och sälta. Seriös spelare som dock kanske inte gör sig bäst att dricka som sällskapsvin med nuvarande ålder på nacken. — 7 years ago

with André

Michael Piaker

9.1

3 June 2018. The Four Horsemen, Brooklyn, NY. — 7 years ago

Kristie Tacey

9.0

Dead leaves, wet stone, cinnamon, tar, wet stone, rose petals with a hint of Brett. #happyvalentinesday — 9 years ago

Hanibal

9.1

I decided to revisit a bottle that was the winner of our horizontal tasting of MSD 2016 village (10 producers tasted blind by 10 participants). And once again this is a hit for a village. Lots of complexity, licorice, spices and red fruits... more than satisfactory length for this level of appellation. — 5 years ago

Randy Ingram

9.5

Really great and different from previous vintages; slightly effervescent and has some nice savory funk to compliment all the fruit. — 6 years ago

PS Michaels

9.2

Very old school. Great stuff. — 7 years ago

Pinotman /// Andreas

9.2

This producer used excessive reductive wine making techniques for his reds in 2015. I tried the whole line up a year ago. Plenty of mercaptans = volatile sulfur = rotten eggs on the nose - i was shocked at the time and thought these will be a hard sell. So what has changed with an extra year on the bottle - still super stinky nose but the wine tastes fine with traces of tar, roses and black cherry. Quite soft right now. There is a lot going on in this wine and it needs at least an hour of decant! For the restaurant sommeliers on this site - your clients will be shocked at first and the reaction of my Vino friends was mixed. I still like this wine and producer - I bought the 16 - but this is really a wine for the folks who have patience. Pricy! 80$ or so. — 7 years ago

Neil Cornish

8.9

Dark and rich. Spice and cola. Has a solid acid backbone. — 7 years ago

Riccardo L.

9.0

Lime skins and butter pecan tarts... sugarless ones. Mmmm. 🤤 — 9 years ago

Coltin Short

9.3

2nd time having this. Showing much more expansive on the palate than 6 months ago. Pure fruit. Long finish. — 9 years ago