Cedarwood, chantarelle broth and ripe strawberry on the nose. Tastes of ripe blueberry, strawberry, light, old leather, a dash of white pepper and a faint whisper of mint. Delicious but slightly thin on the palate to be one of my all-time favorites. — 11 years ago
Perfection for the moment. — 11 years ago
Un Charme qui porte très bien son nom. — 12 years ago
Exceptional! — 12 years ago
Licorice, strong pipe tobacco, cherry, light subtle clove- fantastic! — 12 years ago


Palate never quite matched up with the nose despite a good 30min decant. An absolute fruit and flower bomb on the nose. — 9 years ago
Because stocks opened limit down today @Harry Hackett — 11 years ago

2004. This is a great iteration of the esoteric Charmes-Chambertin. Tannins are yet unresolved and many years are left under this fine Burgundy! — 11 years ago
Ohhhhh SNAP!
The 💣💣💣 — 12 years ago
2013 vintage. Bit samey samey. Decent. But doesn't stand out. — 12 years ago
开瓶有骚气土气,finish 有点腥味... Gets smoother and fruitier over time. Powerful on palate — 12 years ago
Sweet and savoury nose of ripe red fruit, cherry, currant, vegetal notes, Brussel sprout, cauliflower soup, cucumber, leather, underbrush, mushroom and Asian spices. On the palate the wine showed sweet, ripe red fruit, cherry, currant, vegetal notes, cucumber, tobacco, spices, caramel as well as mineral and balsamic notes, paired with medium-plus lively acidity, fully integrated tannin, a smooth mouthfeel and incredible length. The fruit became less pronounced as time passed, to the benefit of the tertiary notes. A medium-bodied, medium-complex, well-balanced red Burgundy that drank young for its age and seemed to be good for another 10+ years. I liked it a lot. 93 — 13 years ago
Rusty red berry goodness @Alec White — 10 years ago
Excellent. — 10 years ago
bordeaux style😂 — 11 years ago
Zan, joli équilibre — 11 years ago
2008. Very good. Tart and firm acidity. Very old school style. Not overripe opulence of today's style. — 12 years ago
2001, drank like a champ — 12 years ago
Too early for now — 12 years ago
Pat Taylor
The nose is different. Much more woodsy and less fruit than I’d have imagined. The flavour profile was blackberry based and again, some wood. Some eucalyptus and green grass. Also some wet soil and cloves. The tannins weren’t a punch in the face by any means, but also haven’t haven’t completely softened as you might expect in a ten year-old. The palate was uninspiring as there was a watery-ness in the mid palate. I’m not sure whether this is over the hill or just not quite there yet and in a dumb phase? Will wait and see for the final two bottles. Solid, I guess. Not yet amazing. — 7 years ago