Antoine Cauchard

8.9

Bière IPA assez forte à 8.3. Des notes épicées et un goût assez intéressant — 10 years ago

Bernardo Llaguno G.

9.0

A friends of mine @Alejandro Garcia said that I needed to do homework and practice makes perfect, so I am starting to work on trying different things. This wine was outstanding for a light lunch. Very jammy wine, easy to drink for anyone. Perfect for an easy evening of chatting. — 10 years ago

Drew Islas

9.1

Got it for $10 at Von's not a bad vino — 11 years ago

Davis Smith

Sommelier Acquerello

9.1

Not bad for a tough vintage! — 11 years ago

Marshall Todd Herron DPM

9.8

The color is very opaque a deep dark purple almost black.
The boquet is so amazing I was sipping it before I realized what I was doing. It has absolutely no tanic smell. It smells like blackberries fresh on the vine. The initial palate taste is dry and not very rich. It has a light feel to it. It has a smooth light beginning and a dry almost tongue tantilizing finish. The flavor is of black currant, blackberry, and chocolate with a slight himt of acidity, but in a good way. It tingles the sides of my anteroir tongue. It has a very dry finish with no aftertaste. This is an amazing wine. This is Alexander Valley at its best. In a nut shell, its a big bold smooth and yet light wine. Almost like a Pinot in heaviness but big bad and bold like a Pure Cab
— 11 years ago

John Van Trijp

9.9

..........RESPECT!.......... — 12 years ago

Gen

9.7

Very good for CA! — 13 years ago

David L

9.3

03' Dominus. Did they make a bad wine in the last 15 years? — 10 years ago

with Randall, Sean and 1 other

Kaitlyn Quackenbush

9.0

Bad ass is the word that came up when drinking this bottle and I think it's the perfect descriptor — 11 years ago

Jay Svoboda

8.9

I'm going to come clean, I'm not a huge Caymus fan. It's by no means a bad wine - far from it - but I've always felt they blend their Cab with too much Zin. I could be wrong on that account, but I don't think I am. Still, a nice brooding nose of dark red and blue fruit, with a touch of candied fruit and wet earth. — 11 years ago

John Bornholdt

9.0

2011, not bad. Nice oaky notes — 11 years ago

Diane Kessler

9.3

The nose is aged Bordeaux. It is delicious with dark fruit, spice, and tobacco. More like a nicely aged Pauilliac. The smoky finish is deliciously long.
The label was in such bad shape that I had to fill in the torn G for it to be ID'd. — 12 years ago

Ginny Cutburth

10

Great tasting, very inexpensive wine. — 12 years ago

Shawn Archambault

9.1

Whoever wrote a bad review. You don't understand. — 10 years ago

Paul J

9.2

Young but with signs of potential. Definitely decant this baby if your drinking it any time soon. Power developing but very condensed and restrained right now. It's Dunn so it can't be bad! — 10 years ago

with Brooke

Justin Ennis

10

I have never had a bad bottle of this vintage!Every time I have this vintage of Insignia it is amazing. — 11 years ago

Glen eagle Kiawah

9.2

Not a bad second bottle night. Good fruit. 2009 — 11 years ago

Samuel Blanchard

9.5

Still youg, a lot of fruit, soft tannin, a beautiful wine. Prouve that good chateau can make beautiful wine with bad year. — 11 years ago

Will Harahan

9.3

Contrary to other wines, D'yquem is in a class of it's own in terms of Sauternes. There is rarely, if ever, a bad year, although some years, like the 2001, stand out more than others. The disparity in quality from a GREAT d'yquem to a mediocre one & so on isn't as drastic as one might imagine. While the older vintages seem to age VERY well, it isn't as discernible from a recent vintage as other wines. Sauternes, in general are consistent, & none more than d'yquem. — 12 years ago

Joe Rice

9.7

Thinking the 2009 was a bad bottle. This was the essence of minerality. — 13 years ago