Christina Reesor

10

9/10 because it wasn't free😆...seriously, so good! Light flavour, but holds its own! — 9 years ago

Beachin Wino

8.9

Had this wine at a friends house. Tastes great on its own and paired nicely with the grilled beef filets we had. Tons of fruit and structure. Blackberry, plum, vanilla, and spice. At this price point it will be another one of our go to weeknight gems. — 10 years ago

with Fred

David Mountan

9.2

Way more easily drinkable than expected. Very smooth and complex at the same time. Yet still light and fruity. Was awesome on its own. — 10 years ago

Charles (Chad) Bucklin

Owner and founder of C. T. Bucklin Wine Advising

9.1

Super vibrant and exciting with great depth. Needs about 3 years to really come into its own. #closdesmouches #josephdrouhin #burgundy — 10 years ago

Tom Riley

9.2

If chardonnay had a textbook, Hanzell would have its own chapter. — 11 years ago

Lisa Labrecque

10

My favorite easy to drink wine all on its own it stands up to the enjoyment test! — 11 years ago

CYesh

9.6

"Nobody puts Baby in a corner". - Johnny Castle. This baby definitely deserves it's own spotlight. — 12 years ago

Lyn Farmer

9.0

Consistently one of my favorite NV Rosé Champagnes the current release continues a glorious tradition. Fresh aromas of red apple abs very fruit with a toasty undertone and vibrant mouse. Excellent with food or on its own. Long finish — 9 years ago

Craig Stanfield

9.1

Third day open and coming into its own. Zesty and round, but not too rich. — 10 years ago

Lilja Valthorsdottir

9.5

Really, really good wine! Perfect with steak and on its own. — 10 years ago

with Ivar

Scott Rogers

9.0

Great value! You will be hard pressed to find a better wine under $10. Great with pork or red sauce and will stand on its own. Spicy cherry, not too heavy on the tannins. — 10 years ago

TMAMA

9.5

Had this at a restaurant. Was delish and full on its own. — 10 years ago

Luis Carrillo

10

Loved it! Very Rich — 11 years ago

Will Harahan

9.3

Contrary to other wines, D'yquem is in a class of it's own in terms of Sauternes. There is rarely, if ever, a bad year, although some years, like the 2001, stand out more than others. The disparity in quality from a GREAT d'yquem to a mediocre one & so on isn't as drastic as one might imagine. While the older vintages seem to age VERY well, it isn't as discernible from a recent vintage as other wines. Sauternes, in general are consistent, & none more than d'yquem. — 11 years ago

Luis Quiroga

9.5

I've been storing this bottle for 5 years. Drinking it makes me regret that I didn't purchase a few of these in 2011. It seems to be 100% cab but tastes and feels like an old world blend. Sophisticated. Balanced. Velvety. Luxurious. It has a juicy berry, licorice opening with a medium nutty, peppery finish. It's perfect for drinking on its own. Very satisfying glass (or two) of California Red. — 9 years ago

Jim Hines

9.3

Full bodied, held its own after 15 years! Very good. — 10 years ago

with Mary

Rebekah Abrams

9.0

Great porch sipper. Easy drinking but can hold its own with summer veggies, fish and even pork. — 10 years ago

Bill Wynne

9.0

Great on its own. Fruity with tannins that are just right. — 10 years ago

Matt Krueger

9.2

Settling into its own. Not overly green with some good fruit starting to poke its head out. — 10 years ago

Andrew Z. Scharf

9.6

Beautiful inky ruby color, medium-long finish. Tannins evolving. Wonderful fruit but just coming into its own. Needs more time. — 11 years ago